In the following video Michael Jones [also known as "InspiringPhilosophy"] interacts with Dan McClennan's critique of Jones' views and videos defending the idea that Jesus' prophecies about His soon return were conditional. By so doing Jones exposes McClennan's dogmatism, double standards and poor scholarship. See also my blog which argues for partial preterism. It seems to me that with a little tweeking both views could be true. Or at the very least compatible.
Exposing Dan McClellan’s Dogmas & Double Standards
https://youtube.com/watch?v=bsP6i5__pFU&si=x0IJ82-DbPGjJYeR
