Famous Atheist [Sam Harris] FINALLY Admits Theism is Back

 

Famous Atheist FINALLY Admits Theism is Back
https://youtu.be/S5RN3kzU3u0

 

 

 

Charles Murray On Why He Is NOW Taking Religion Seriously

 

Skeptic and atheistic agnostic Michael Shermer interviews Charles Murray on why he is NOW taking religion seriously. Formerly an agnostic, Charles Murray now identifies as a kind of "Christian" in some sense.

Charles Murray: Why I’m Taking Religion Seriously  

https://youtu.be/fUmtt6rTlZY

Charles Murry's new book is titled, "Taking Religion Seriously"

Debate: Does the West Need a Religious Revival?

 Full Debate: Does the West Need a Religious Revival?
Catholic Ross Douthat and "Christian" Ayaan Hirsi Ali face off against atheists Michael Shermer and Adam Carolla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG32pQrsQ5U

Is Theistic Belief Rational in a Scientific Age? | William Lane Craig vs. Jeff Hester

 

Is Theistic Belief Rational in a Scientific Age? | William Lane Craig vs. Jeff Hester
https://youtu.be/PXE5lQW5RQw

Why We Should WANT God to Exist (Dr. Liz Jackson)

 

Why We Should WANT God to Exist (Dr. Liz Jackson)
https://youtu.be/G66qBl_57j8

 

 

 

 

Should We Want God to Exist? Dr. Liz Jackson

 

Philosopher Liz Jackson discusses whether we should want God to exist.

Should We Want God to Exist? Dr. Liz Jackson
https://youtu.be/sukh4FeGaEo

Does Atheism Entail a Contradiction? with Joshua Rasmussen

Christian philosopher Joshua Rasmussen explores the issue whether atheism entails a contradiction.

Does Atheism Entail a Contradiction? with Joshua Rasmussen
https://youtu.be/CiCh6DlGmQs

 

Do You KNOW God Exists? Religious Epistemology Q&A

 

Do You KNOW God Exists? Religious Epistemology Q&A

A Playlist of videos featuring Andrew Moon: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXVTD52ufDA&list=PLlVH-ThCazKlr9f_l43o98Tk-oLVw9O2Z&t=0s

Dr. Moon's website: https://andrewymoon.wordpress.com/

Nontraditional Arguments for Theism with Joe Schmid

I discovered a brilliant agnostic named Joe Schmid when he debated Randal Rauser where both of them played Devil's Advocate for the view they don't hold. So Schmid as an agnostic argued for theism and Rauser who is a professed Christian argued for atheism. In the following videos Joe Schmid lists and explains some nontraditional arguments for theism. Many of them are consistent with presuppositionalism and other apologetical methods like classical apologetics.

Nontraditional Arguments for Theism (Part 1/2)

https://youtu.be/8V7TvkjXW3Q

Nontraditional Arguments for Theism (Part 2/2)

https://youtu.be/syW37-XsUe8

 New Atheism and its Critics

https://youtu.be/1w6MRwyEsjQ

Joe Schmid's YouTube channel: Majesty of Reason


Joe Schmid's Devil's Advocate debate with Randal Rauser:

GOD DEBATE: Randal Rauser the Atheist vs Joe Schmid the Theist

https://youtu.be/68FxtG49ngY

I recommend reading the critiques of Randal Rauser's progressive version of "Christianity" by the late Steve Hays and other bloggers at Triablogue: https://triablogue.blogspot.com/search/label/Randal%20Rauser

DEBATE: Would God Allow Evil? CosmicSkeptic vs InspiringPhilosophy

Being a Calvinist I wouldn't use all of the arguments that Michael Jones uses in this debate. Nevertheless, in my opinion Michael Jones won the debate. Though, Alex O'Connor did a pretty good job as well. Decide for yourself.

DEBATE: Would God Allow Evil? @CosmicSkeptic vs @InspiringPhilosophy

https://youtu.be/hNF9bTESZwE

See also this debate review:

Reviewing the @InspiringPhilosophy vs @CosmicSkeptic Debate on God and Evil

https://youtu.be/fHjlaA4Qp_Q

Definitions of Atheism

In times past for the sake of clarity, precision and dialogue I had no problem with defining "atheism" as a lack of belief in God/Goddess/gods/goddesses. I'm still willing to use that definition for the sake of discussion. However, I'm not longer certain it aids in precision. In fact, I now lean toward that popular definition as making things less precise. See the podcast I link to below where Justin Schieber interviews "Ozymandias Ramses II". Contrary to that popular contemporary definition, in the European philosophical and theological tradition of the last few hundred years atheism was defined as a belief in the non-existence of gods. Only in recent years has it been defined as a lack of belief in gods. It was within that European tradition that atheist crusader Charles Bradlaugh first precisely defined atheism as a lack of a belief in gods in his "A Plea for Atheism" (1864). He had noted elsewhere that "no position is more continuously misrepresented" than atheism. He stated: "Atheism is without God. It does not assert no God." It was probably Thomas Henry Huxley who first to coined the term "agnostic" in 1869.

Modern atheists distinguish between positive atheism and negative atheism (also called strong and weak atheism). Positive atheism is the positive belief that there are no gods. Negative atheism is merely the lack of a belief in gods. Depending on one's perspective, negative atheism can be seen as a form of agnosticism or agnosticism a form of negative atheism. While some positive atheists claim they can disprove ALL gods, knowledgeable positive atheists deny that one must be able to prove the non-existence of all gods and supernatural entities (even if one can disprove some). According to some estimates there have been over 2,500 different gods and supernatural entities believed in and/or seriously described and recorded in human history. To disprove all of them would be an enormous inductive task. But even if, hypothetically, one were successful at disproving all those that does nothing to address unknown, unrevealed or un-thought of supernatural entities. In many cases it's very difficult to prove universal negatives. This is especially true when it comes to supernatural entities because they have a wide variety of claimed attributes, powers, characteristics and personalities. For example, one can easily disprove the existence of gods that actually live on Mount Olympus. But what if Mount Olympus is symbolic of something spiritual and immaterial? When it comes to atheists, for all they know the finite god Zeus does exist but doesn't literally and physically rule from Olympus.

In recent years George H. Smith's book Atheism: The Case Against God was one of the most influential books to disseminate and make popular the definition of atheism as merely a lack of belief in God/Goddess/gods/goddesses.

Here's a link to an article by Smith on Defining Atheism

It is only ignorant atheists who claim that atheism only ever meant a lack of belief in gods. The following will be a list of definitions from reputable (sometimes even authoritative) sources which demonstrate that atheism can mean and has (at least in the past) meant a belief in the non-existence of gods. Some of these sources are contemporary rather than antiquated works. Apparently, these sources are still influenced by the European philosophical and theological tradition I mentioned earlier.

"According to the most usual definition, an atheist is a person who maintains that there is no God, that is, that the sentence "God exists" expresses a false proposition." - Paul Edwards in Encyclopedia of Philosophy Volume I page 175


"Atheism is the view that there is no God." - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://www.iep.utm.edu/atheism/


" 'Atheism' means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God." - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/fall2008/entries/atheism-agnosticism/

...Therefore, in philosophy at least, atheism should be construed as the proposition that God does not exist (or, more broadly, the proposition that there are no gods). -Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/

"Atheism is ostensibly the doctrine that there is no God." -- Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2005)


"Atheism (from Greek: a + theos + ismos "not believing in god") refers in its broadest sense to a denial of theism (the belief in the existence of a single deity or deities)."- New World Encyclopedia
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/atheism


"atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable."- Encyclopædia Britannica
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism


"ATHEISM (from Gr. ἀ-, privative, and θεός, God), literally a system of belief which denies the existence of God. The term as generally used, however, is highly ambiguous." - Encyclopædia Britannica 11th edition
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/34209/34209-h/34209-h.htm#ar219


“Atheism is the deliberate, definite, dogmatic denial of the existence of God. It is not satisfied with appropriate truth or relative truth, but claims to know the ins and outs of the game being quite clearly the absolute denial of the absolute.” - Etienne Borne

Atheism, from the Greek a-theos ("no-god"), is the philosophical position that God doesn't exist. It is distinguished from agnosticism, the argument that it is impossible to know whether God exists or not (Academic American Encyclopedia).

Atheism, system of thought developed around the denial of God's existence. Atheism, so defined, first appeared during the Enlightenment, the age of reason (Random House Encyclopedia-1977).

Atheism (from the Greek a-, not, and theos, god) is the view that there are no gods. A widely used sense denotes merely not believing in God and is consistent with agnosticism. A stricter sense denotes a belief that there is no God, the use has become the standard one (Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy-1995).

Atheism is the doctrine that there is no God. Some atheists support this claim by arguments, but these arguments are usually directed against the Christian concept of God, and are largely irrelevant to other possible gods (Oxford Companion to Philosophy-1995).

Atheism is disbelief in God (Introduction to Philosophy, Perry and Bratman, Oxford University Press-1986).

Atheism from the Greek a (not) plus theos (god). The doctrine of disbelief in a supreme being (Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion, William Reese, HumanitiesPress-1996).

Atheism (Greek, a- [private prefix] + theos, god) is the view that there is no divine being, no God (Dictionary of Philosophy, Thomas Mautner, Editor-1996).

Atheism is the belief that God doesn't exist (The World Book Encyclopedia-1991).

Atheism, Greek atheos-Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of God (Oxford English Dictionary-1989)

Atheism, commonly speaking, is the denial of God. Theism (from the Greek theos, God) is belief in or conceptualization of God, atheism is the rejection of such belief or conceptualization.In the ancient world atheism was rarely a clearly formulated position (Encyclopedia Americana-1990).

Atheism, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. Atheism is to be distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open whether there is a god or not, professing to find the question unanswerable, for the atheist, the non-existence of god is a certainty (The New Encyclopedia Britannia-1993).

According to the most usual definition, an atheist is a person who maintains that there is no god…(rejects eccentric definitions of the word) (The Encyclopedia of Philosophy-1967).

Atheism is the doctrine that God does not exist, that belief in the existence of God is a false belief. The word God here refers to a divine being regarded as the independent creator of the world, a being superlatively powerful, wise and good (Encyclopedia of Religion-1987).

Atheism (Greek and Roman): Atheism is a dogmatic creed, consisting in the denial of every kind of supernatural power. Atheism has not often been seriously maintained at any period of civilized thought (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics-Vol II).

 Atheism is the rejection of theism: a-theism. Atheists maintain some or all of the following claims: that theism is false; that theism is unbelievable; that theism is rationally unacceptable; that theism is morally unacceptable. G. Oppy, "Arguments for Atheism," S. Bullivant & M. Ruse, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Atheism (OUP, 2014), 53.

See also how these three intelligent atheists Justin Schieber, Ben Watkins and Ozymandias argue for why the new definition is inappropriate.
https://realatheology.wordpress.com/2017/05/31/ra010-interview-ozymandias-ramses-ii-on-atheism-and-lacktheism/
I've archived this podcast HERE.

Some quotes taken HERE

See this YouTube audio with William Lane Craig

http://youtu.be/XcuSMQVq5dM

Reasonable Faith podcast with William Lane Craig on the definition of "atheism"
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/the-definition-that-will-not-die

Atheist Stephen Woodford on the Definition(s) of "Atheism"

Book Reviews of Recent Atheist Authors 
by Christian Apologists
http://misclane.blogspot.com/2013/09/book-reviews-of-recent-atheist-authors.html