Debate: Does the God of the Bible Exist? Elias Ayala vs. Dan Barker

 

Debate: Does the God of the Bible Exist? Elias Ayala vs. Dan Barker

https://www.youtube.com/live/yeucoXcUE7c?si=JV_hU5vZb23MyXnQ

Worldviews, Preconditions of Intelligibility, and Artificial Intelligence ( ChatGPT)

 
See also my blogpost: Which Worldview Can "Best" Overcome These Problems According to ChatGPT

As a Van Tillian presuppositionalist I believe Christianity alone provides for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience. I was curious what Artificial Intelligence would say. So, I asked ChatGPT three questions. I was pleasantly surprised by the answer. The three questions were:

1. tell me which worldviews or worldview provide for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience.

2. tell me which worldview BEST provides for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience by comparision [[spelling typo]].

3. of the major options of classical theism, which has the greatest possibility and plausibility of being true?

---

tell me which worldviews or worldview provide for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience.

ChatGPT said:

The preconditions of intelligibility and human experience are fundamental questions that address how we make sense of the world, perceive meaning, and understand reality. These preconditions typically involve the necessary conditions for thought, knowledge, language, and reason. In philosophical terms, these are questions about epistemology (the study of knowledge) and ontology (the study of being or reality).

Here are some worldviews and philosophical perspectives that provide for these preconditions:

1. Theism (Especially Classical Theism)

• Premise: A belief in a rational, personal Creator (e.g., God in the Judeo-Christian, Islamic, or other theistic traditions) who has created the universe with order, logic, and meaning.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Absolute order and logic: In theism, the idea that the universe is intelligible relies on a rational, purposeful Creator who imbues the universe with laws of logic, reason, and cause-and-effect.
  • Objective truth: Theism posits the existence of absolute truths and objective reality because of a rational Creator who has designed the world to be understandable by human minds.
  • Human capacity for reason: The theistic worldview often holds that humans are created in the image of God, granting them the ability to reason, understand, and experience the world meaningfully.
• Example: Classical theistic perspectives, such as Christianity (with its belief in a logical, coherent God who sustains creation), Islam, and Judaism, hold that God's nature provides the foundation for rational thought, moral order, and human experience.

2. Naturalism (Materialism or Physicalism)

• Premise: Naturalism is the worldview that all that exists is the natural world (i.e., the physical universe), and that everything can be explained by natural laws and processes, without invoking supernatural causes.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Scientific laws and consistency: Naturalism asserts that the universe operates according to consistent laws of nature (e.g., physics, biology) that make human cognition and understanding possible.
  • Human reason as a product of evolution: Naturalism often explains human rationality as an evolutionary development, with our cognitive abilities evolving to make sense of the world in ways that are beneficial for survival.
  • Objective reality: While naturalism generally rejects supernatural or non-material explanations, it upholds that there is an objective reality that can be studied and understood through science and reason.
• Example: Secular humanism or scientific materialism, which holds that all phenomena are the result of physical processes, may emphasize the importance of empirical observation and rational thought.

3. Idealism (Especially Absolute Idealism)

• Premise: Idealism is the belief that reality is fundamentally mental or immaterial, and that all phenomena are manifestations of mind, consciousness, or spirit.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • The primacy of mind or consciousness: In idealism, reality is seen as rooted in the mind or consciousness. Without a universal or divine consciousness (e.g., in Hegelian idealism), the world would lack order or intelligibility.
  • Human perception and thought: Idealism contends that human experience and knowledge are shaped by the mental or spiritual framework that underpins all of reality. This view emphasizes that reality and thought are interconnected, and that the mind plays a crucial role in making sense of the world.
• Example: Philosophers like George Berkeley (subjective idealism) and G.W.F. Hegel (absolute idealism) argue that the foundation of knowledge and intelligibility comes from a mental or spiritual reality.

4. Phenomenology

• Premise: Phenomenology, founded by Edmund Husserl, focuses on the structure of human experience and the way phenomena appear to us through consciousness.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Consciousness as the starting point: Phenomenology holds that all knowledge and meaning come from direct experience, and that the way we interpret the world is shaped by our consciousness.
  • Intentionality of consciousness: This means that consciousness is always "about" something—i.e., it is directed at objects, ideas, or experiences in the world. This relational structure makes intelligibility possible.
• Example: The phenomenological approach assumes that human experience is the bedrock of meaning and intelligibility, and that all objects of knowledge are mediated by conscious experience.

5. Existentialism

• Premise: Existentialism focuses on individual experience, freedom, and the meaning of life. Existentialists like Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger argue that humans must create meaning in an inherently meaningless or absurd world.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Freedom and subjectivity: Existentialism emphasizes human freedom and choice in interpreting and creating meaning from the world. The individual is responsible for creating their own understanding and experiences.
  • Authentic experience: Existentialists argue that authentic human experience, where one confronts the absurdity or meaninglessness of existence, is crucial for forming a coherent worldview.
• Example: Sartre's existentialism, where human consciousness creates meaning in an otherwise indifferent universe, is a key example. The precondition for intelligibility, in this case, is the freedom and responsibility of individuals to give meaning to their lives.

6. Pragmatism

• Premise: Pragmatism, associated with philosophers like Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, asserts that meaning and truth are shaped by practical consequences and human experience.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Practical application of ideas: Pragmatism suggests that knowledge and ideas are meaningful if they lead to practical outcomes or solve problems in the real world. Truth is not abstract or static, but something that works in practice.
  • Human experience as the foundation: Pragmatists argue that knowledge is ultimately shaped by human action, interaction, and the context in which it is applied.
• Example: William James’s view that truth is what "works" in human life (e.g., beliefs and ideas that lead to successful action) is central to the pragmatist perspective.

7. Postmodernism

• Premise: Postmodernism is a broad philosophical approach that questions the existence of universal truths, objective meaning, and grand narratives.
• Preconditions for intelligibility:
  • Relativity of truth: Postmodernism holds that truth and meaning are socially constructed and contingent upon cultural, linguistic, and historical contexts.
  • Language and discourse: Postmodernists emphasize that language shapes our experience and understanding of reality. There is no "objective" truth apart from the language games we play.
• Example: Thinkers like Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Jean Baudrillard challenge traditional notions of truth, meaning, and knowledge, arguing that these are always mediated by power structures, language, and social norms.

---

Which worldview provides the best preconditions for intelligibility and human experience?

• Theism, particularly classical theism, provides a strong and coherent foundation for both intelligibility and human experience. It asserts that the world is rationally ordered, meaning can be found in existence, and humans are capable of understanding the world because they are created with minds that reflect the rationality of the Creator. This worldview holds that objective truth exists and that the human capacity for knowledge and reasoning comes from a higher, divine source.

• Naturalism can also provide for intelligibility, but it is grounded in the idea that human reason is the product of evolutionary processes, and the world is intelligible because it operates according to natural laws. However, it may face challenges in explaining the ultimate meaning behind existence or the ultimate foundation of reason.

• Idealism, phenomenology, and existentialism also provide for human experience in different ways, emphasizing consciousness, subjectivity, or freedom, but they may not always offer the same foundational structure for objective intelligibility as theism does.

Each worldview provides different insights into the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience, and their strength or adequacy depends on what one considers the ultimate foundation of truth, meaning, and reality.

You said:

tell me which worldview BEST provides for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience by comparision.

ChatGPT said:

When comparing worldviews in terms of which best provides the preconditions for intelligibility and human experience, we’re dealing with a fundamental philosophical question: What worldview can best account for the meaningfulness of our thoughts, reason, perception, language, and experience of the world?

To determine which worldview best provides for these preconditions, we need to assess how each worldview handles core issues such as:

1. The existence of objective reality and truth
2. The rationality of the universe and human capacity for reason
3. The foundation for knowledge (epistemology)
4. The experience of meaning, purpose, and value
5. The connection between human cognition and the external world

Theism (Classical Theism) vs. Naturalism vs. Idealism vs. Existentialism

1. Classical Theism (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Judaism)

• Premises:
  • There is an intelligible and rational universe created by a personal, omnipotent, and omniscient God.
  • Human beings are created in the image of God, with the ability to reason, understand, and experience the world.
  • Objective moral values and truths exist because they are grounded in the nature of God.
• Preconditions of intelligibility and experience:
  • Rationality: The universe operates according to rational laws because it was designed by a rational, purposeful Creator. God’s mind provides the foundational intelligibility of the world.
  • Objective Truth: Objective truths exist because they are grounded in the nature of God, who is the ultimate source of all truth and reality.
  • Human Reason: Humans are capable of understanding the world because they are created in the image of God, reflecting God’s own ability to reason and make sense of the universe.
  • Meaning and Purpose: Since God is the Creator and sustainer of the world, human experience is meaningful and purposeful by design. Life has inherent value and purpose.
• Strength: Classical theism provides the most coherent foundation for both intelligibility and human experience because it explains the rational structure of the universe (through a rational Creator), grounds objective truth, and gives humans intrinsic value and purpose. It answers why the world is intelligible and why humans can reason about it in the first place.

2. Naturalism (Materialism/Physicalism)

• Premises:
  • Only the physical world exists; everything, including human consciousness and reason, is a result of natural laws and physical processes.
  • Human reason is the product of evolution, shaped to help us survive in the world.
• Preconditions of intelligibility and experience:
  • Rationality: Naturalism asserts that the human mind and its rational abilities are the products of evolutionary processes, which means our reasoning is grounded in survival instincts rather than a transcendent, objective foundation.
  • Objective Reality: The universe is intelligible because it operates according to natural laws. These laws, which we discover through science, make the world understandable.
  • Human Reason: Reason is seen as an evolutionary tool for survival, which means it is reliable within the context of understanding the natural world, but not necessarily for discerning ultimate truths about meaning or purpose.
  • Meaning and Purpose: From a naturalistic standpoint, meaning and purpose are subjective or constructed by individuals. There is no objective purpose to life beyond survival and reproduction.
• Strength: Naturalism offers a consistent and empirical approach to understanding the world and provides a scientific basis for intelligibility. However, it struggles with grounding objective moral values and ultimate meaning (why we exist or the purpose of the universe), often reducing them to human constructs.

3. Idealism (e.g., Absolute Idealism, Phenomenal Idealism)

• Premises:
  • Reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual, and the material world is either a product of consciousness or cannot be separated from it.
  • Human experience, knowledge, and the world are all interconnected within a universal mind or consciousness.
• Preconditions of intelligibility and experience:
  • Rationality: Since reality is ultimately mental, reason is embedded within the structure of consciousness itself. The intelligibility of the world is therefore dependent on the mind, and its laws and structures.
  • Objective Reality: Idealism holds that objective reality is mental in nature. For example, in Hegelian idealism, reality is the unfolding of a rational, dialectical process that can be understood through reason.
  • Human Reason: Humans are part of a larger, universal mind or consciousness. Our ability to reason is a reflection of this larger rationality, allowing us to understand the world within the framework of that universal consciousness.
  • Meaning and Purpose: In idealism, the world’s meaning is derived from its ultimate connection to a higher consciousness or spiritual reality. There is an inherent purpose to existence as part of a broader metaphysical or spiritual development.
• Strength: Idealism provides a rich account of how human consciousness and reason are fundamental to understanding the world, especially in a metaphysical sense. However, it can be abstract and difficult to apply practically to physical reality as we experience it. It also lacks empirical grounding, which makes it hard to test in the same way as naturalism.

4. Existentialism

• Premises:
  • Human beings are free agents who must create their own meaning and purpose in an inherently meaningless or absurd world.
  • There is no inherent meaning to existence; rather, humans create meaning through their actions and choices.
• Preconditions of intelligibility and experience:
  • Rationality: Existentialists acknowledge that humans are rational beings capable of making sense of their experiences, but they often emphasize subjectivity over objective reason.
  • Objective Reality: Existentialism generally holds that reality is indifferent to human concerns, and there is no ultimate, objective truth about the meaning of life. The world exists without any preordained purpose or rational structure.
  • Human Reason: Humans create meaning and purpose through their subjective choices. While we can understand the world through reason, we must confront the inherent absurdity of existence and live authentically.
  • Meaning and Purpose: Existentialists believe meaning must be created by individuals, often through acts of freedom or confronting the absurdity of existence. Life is meaningful only because humans choose to give it meaning.
• Strength: Existentialism highlights the human experience of freedom and the capacity to create personal meaning, even in the face of an indifferent universe. However, it lacks a foundational basis for universal truths or objective values. It offers subjective meaning but no grounding for why the world is intelligible in the first place.

---

Which Worldview Best Provides for the Preconditions of Intelligibility and Human Experience?

Classical Theism offers the best framework for the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience. Here's why:

• Rational foundation: The existence of a rational Creator provides a coherent basis for the intelligibility of the universe. If the universe is created by a rational, purposeful mind (God), it makes sense that the world would be understandable by human minds. Our capacity for reason reflects the rationality of our Creator.

• Objective truth: Classical theism provides a grounding for absolute truths. Without a transcendent God, naturalism struggles to explain the objective nature of truth, and idealism tends to focus more on the subjective, mental nature of reality.

• Human experience and meaning: In theism, human life has inherent purpose and meaning because it is created by God, and humans are made in God’s image with the capacity for relationship, knowledge, and rationality. This provides an objective grounding for both personal meaning and collective moral values.

• Moral order: Theism uniquely grounds objective moral values and duties in the nature of God. In contrast, naturalism and existentialism face challenges in explaining why certain things are "right" or "wrong" in an ultimate sense.

Conclusion:

Classical theism provides the most comprehensive and coherent explanation for the preconditions of intelligibility (why we can reason about the world and find it orderly) and human experience (why life has meaning and purpose). It grounds both human cognition and the objective world in a rational, purposeful Creator, offering a more robust framework than naturalism, idealism, or existentialism.

 

 

 

of the major options of classical theism, which has the greatest possibility and plausibility of being true?

ChatGPT said:

When considering the greatest possibility and plausibility of the truth of a classical theistic worldview, we must explore the various major branches of classical theism, including Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and others. Each of these traditions posits a rational, personal God as the foundation of the universe and human experience, but they differ in specific doctrinal details, the nature of God, and the paths through which God is known.

The question of which of these has the greatest possibility and plausibility of being true involves a combination of theological, philosophical, historical, and experiential considerations. Here's a breakdown of these perspectives:

---

1. Christianity (particularly Orthodox or Catholic Christianity)

Core Belief: Christianity posits a triune God (God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) who created the universe, who became incarnate in Jesus Christ for the salvation of humanity, and who offers a personal relationship with God through grace and faith.

Possibility and Plausibility:

• Historical Evidence: Christianity is unique among the major world religions in its claim that God became incarnate in Jesus Christ and that this event is supported by historical testimony (the Gospels, writings of early Christian fathers, and the tradition of the Church). The resurrection of Jesus is seen as the pivotal event in Christian theology, and many argue it has a reasonable historical foundation based on early eyewitness accounts and the rapid growth of the Christian movement.

• Philosophical Coherence: Christianity provides a metaphysical framework for understanding God's nature (triune) and the nature of human beings (created in God's image), offering a rich doctrinal system that addresses complex issues such as morality, suffering, and the problem of evil in a way that resonates deeply with human experience.

• Theological Strength: The incarnation and atonement in Christianity offer a profoundly relational view of God and humanity. The idea that God entered into the human experience through Christ has been seen as a highly plausible explanation for God's desire to be intimately involved with creation, offering both transcendence and immanence in a coherent way.

• Experiential and Transformational Evidence: Christianity has a long history of transformative spiritual experiences and miracles, which many see as confirming the plausibility of its claims. Furthermore, the worldwide and ongoing impact of Christianity in shaping moral and social systems strengthens its plausibility.

Challenges:

• The Problem of the Trinity: The concept of the Trinity (three persons in one God) can be difficult for many to grasp and has been a point of contention within and outside Christianity. However, many theologians argue that this doctrine is philosophically coherent, especially when compared to other religious ideas about God's nature.

• The Problem of Evil: While Christianity offers a theodicy (an explanation for why evil exists), it remains a complex and often debated issue. The existence of suffering in a world created by an all-powerful, good God remains one of the most profound challenges to the plausibility of theism.

---

2. Islam

Core Belief: Islam teaches that Allah (God) is absolutely one and indivisible, and that the Qur’an is the final and complete revelation of God's will, revealed to the Prophet Muhammad. Muslims believe in a personal relationship with God through faith, prayer, and submission to the will of Allah.

Possibility and Plausibility:

• Monotheism: Islam offers one of the most rigorous and coherent monotheistic views of God, emphasizing the absolute oneness and uniqueness of Allah. The rejection of any division in God's nature (as seen in the Christian doctrine of the Trinity) makes the Islamic view more philosophically straightforward in terms of divine simplicity.

• Historical Foundation: Islam claims that Muhammad is the final prophet, and the Qur’an is the final, unaltered revelation. The rapid spread of Islam, its strong historical presence, and the preservation of the Qur’an over centuries contribute to the plausibility of Islam as a truth-claim.

• Philosophical Simplicity: Islamic theology emphasizes tawhid (the oneness of God) and God's absolute transcendence, which makes for a simpler metaphysical view of God compared to Christian trinitarianism. God’s will and commands are paramount, and human submission to Allah’s will is central to life.

• Experiential Evidence: Muslims report deep, transformative experiences through prayer (salat), fasting (ramadan), and reflection on the Qur’an. The sense of direct relationship with a transcendent yet personal God is a key feature of Islam's appeal.

Challenges:

• The Problem of Muhammad's Finality: One of Islam's central tenets is that Muhammad is the last prophet. For many, especially those from other religious traditions, this raises the question of why God would send a final revelation so late in history, and why not more universally accessible or understandable.

• The Problem of God’s Transcendence and Immanence: While Islam emphasizes God's transcendence, some critics argue that it can sometimes lead to an impersonal view of God, making it harder for followers to relate to Him in a deeply personal way. This contrasts with Christianity's incarnation and relational God.

---

3. Judaism

Core Belief: Judaism teaches that God (YHWH) revealed Himself to the Israelites through prophets, and that Jews are chosen to be God's people with a special covenant. The Hebrew Scriptures (Tanakh) contain God's laws and promises, and Judaism awaits the coming of the Messiah.

Possibility and Plausibility:

• Monotheism: Judaism’s emphasis on God’s absolute oneness aligns closely with philosophical and metaphysical arguments for a simple and indivisible God. This makes it a strong candidate for providing the most straightforward monotheistic view of God.

• Historical Evidence: Judaism has the longest historical continuity of any of the Abrahamic religions. The historical covenants, the Exodus, and the rise of the Jewish people as a nation, despite adversities, provide strong evidence of a divine purpose and intervention.

• Moral Framework: Judaism offers a robust ethical and legal system (the Torah and Talmud), which emphasizes justice, charity, and righteousness. This moral framework resonates with human experience and has contributed to Western civilization’s ethical systems.

Challenges:

• Messianic Expectations: Judaism’s claim that the Messiah has not yet come is a point of divergence from Christianity and Islam, which both claim to have found the Messiah. This raises the question of whether Judaism's worldview could be considered "incomplete" compared to these other faiths.

• God's Relationship with Humanity: While Judaism emphasizes God's covenant with His people, critics argue that Judaism offers less of a universal salvation message compared to Christianity and Islam. This may limit its global appeal as a worldview that answers the broader human condition.

---

Conclusion: Which Classical Theistic Worldview Has the Greatest Possibility and Plausibility of Being True?

Christianity appears to have the greatest possibility and plausibility of being true for several reasons:

1. Historical Foundations: Christianity’s claim of the resurrection of Jesus Christ is supported by a wealth of historical evidence and eyewitness testimony, which sets it apart from other worldviews. The resurrection is a unique event in world history, offering a vindication of Jesus' claims and the establishment of Christianity as a movement.

2. Philosophical Coherence: Christianity's triune God provides a sophisticated and philosophically coherent understanding of God’s nature as both transcendent and immanent. The doctrine of the Incarnation (God becoming human in Jesus Christ) allows for a deeply personal relationship with God while maintaining His divine transcendence.

3. Theological Strength: Christianity addresses profound theological questions about evil, suffering, and redemption in ways that resonate deeply with human experience. The idea of grace and salvation through Christ provides an answer to humanity's existential dilemmas that feels both realistic and hopeful.

4. Experiential Evidence: The transformative experiences of millions of believers through personal encounters with God, prayers, and the sacraments give substantial experiential evidence of Christianity’s truth claims.

While Islam and Judaism also present compelling worldviews, Christianity’s combination of historical evidence, philosophical coherence, and personal experience make it a powerful contender for providing the best account of reality in terms of the preconditions of intelligibility and human experience.

Dr. Greg Bahnsen, The Impropriety of Evidentially Arguing for the Resurrection

 

 

The following article is a classic one by presuppositionalist Greg Bahnsen. I myself am a presuppositionalist, but I like to sometimes use non-presuppositional arguments [or at least ones that aren't overtly presuppositional]. In this way, my apologetics can sometimes be similar to Steve Hays'

 

Dr. Greg Bahnsen, The Impropriety of Evidentially Arguing for the Resurrection
https://answersingenesis.org/apologetics/the-impropriety-of-evidentially-arguing-for-the-resurrection/

To balance off Bahnsen's views:

Is it improper to argue evidentially for the Resurrection? by Steve Hays
https://triablogue.blogspot.com/2020/04/is-it-improper-to-argue-evidentially.html

#13 Leaping Lessing’s Ugly, Broad Ditch by William Lane Craig
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/leaping-lessings-ugly-broad-ditch 

 

 

 

 

David Bahnsen on his late father the great apologist Greg Bahnsen

 

In Memory of, Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen. Twenty Years Ago Today.
https://www.bahnsen.com/blog/index.php/2015/12/11/in-memory-of-dr-greg-l-bahnsen-twenty-years-ago-today-qMvVS

The Bahnsen Conference 2015 - Keynote Speaker David L Bahnsen
https://soundcloud.com/cognative-54949955/the-bahnsen-conference-2015-keynote-speaker-david-l-bahnsen?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

One of Many Possible Calvinistic Approaches To the Problem of Evil

 

I recommend Vincent Cheung's materials with various qualification and caveats. I've expressed and listed some of my disagreements and agreements with Vincent Cheung in one of my blogs HERE. For example, I disagree with Cheung's tendency toward Hyper-Calvinism. Due to his Hyper-Calvinistic tendencies some of his solutions to the Problem of Evil will be difficult for many people to accept, including Calvinists. Nevertheless, he makes some great points in the following article. Some of his points I'm open to but don't dogmatically hold. They can be possible options as last ditch responses to the problem of evil. The more options Christians have in responding to the problem of evil from a Christian point of view, the more it demonstrates that the problem is not so problematic for Christianity.

So, I encourage people (especially my fellow Calvinists) to read his materials and add more tools into their apologetical tool box. Tools that won't be one's "go to" answers, but can function as alternative back-up and reserved answers. For example, most Calvinists appeal to compatibilism and deny occasionalism. Whereas Cheung thinks that's a mistake because the real question is whether humans have freedom relative to God. Given his understanding of occasionalism, no one has freedom relative to God, because God directly controls all things.

 

The Problem of Evil by Vincent Cheung
https://www.vincentcheung.com/2005/03/15/the-problem-of-evil/

 

 See Also his related book The Author of Sin which is also freely online.

Here's a quote from pages 20-21 of The Author of Sin which addresses the problem of evil.

 

The writers exercise remarkable restraint toward compatibilism. They have everything set
up well enough that they could blast it to smithereens, but they want to play nice. So they
settle for saying that Augustine's is a "dubious contribution," and that the deterministic
aspects of his philosophy "cancel out any meaningful application of the concept of free
will."
This means that if a compatibilist truly affirms divine determinism, then what he says about human "freedom" or "free will" is meaningless – it is nonsense. These writers see this – most Calvinists refuse to see it.

Summary
Here is the way to avoid nonsense:
1. Affirm absolute divine determinism.
2. Deny all human freedom.
3. Base moral responsibility on God's sovereign decree to judge mankind.
4. Answer almost all related objections by doing the following:
a. Affirm that God is just and righteous by definition.¹²
b. Deny the unjustified premise, "responsibility presupposes freedom."¹³

There is no twisting and turning, no philosophical gymnastics, and no need to redefine this
and qualify that. God is sovereign, man is not free – and there is no problem. This is
biblical, coherent, simple, and defensible.

Footnotes:
12 This renders all "problem of evil" and "author of sin" type of objections inapplicable.
13 This renders human freedom irrelevant to the discussion.

VIDEO of the Classic Bahnsen vs. Tabash Debate

 

For many years people have listened to this classic debate through audio only. Finally, the FULL VIDEO of the classic debate is on YouTube. 

Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Edward Tabash "Does God Exist?"
https://youtu.be/euHPhbCcWVU

Dr. Richard Brash on Van Til’s Presuppositions and Providential Preservation of Scripture

 

Richard Brash addresses the issue: ""Must Presuppositionalists be KJV Only? A Re-examination of Cornelius Van Til's Presuppositions in Respect of Providential Preservation"

Dr. Richard Brash on Van Til’s Presuppositions and Providential Preservation of Scripture
https://youtu.be/3XZYlzcPikM

The failure of classical Christian apologetics? (Interview with Ron DiGiacomo)

 

I first encountered Ron DiGiacomo's original blog around 2009 or slightly before. I appreciated his insights in presuppositional apologetics and how he tried to integrate Van Tillian presuppositionalism and Clarkian presuppositionalism. Here are the links to his blogs:

 ORIGINAL Blog

NEW Blog

The failure of classical Christian apologetics? (Interview with Ron DiGiacomo)
https://youtu.be/Q0h5VjQlCZo

Presuppositional Book Reviews by Bahnsen and Frame of the book "Classical Apologetics" by R. C. Sproul, John Gerstner, and Arthur Lindsley

 

A Critique of "Classical Apologetics" by presuppositionalist Dr. Greg Bahnsen:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200719063714/http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/pa061.htm

 

Van Til and the Ligonier Apologetic by presuppositionalist John M. Frame:
https://frame-poythress.org/van-till-and-the-ligonier-apologetic/

The Myth of Neutrality by Dr Greg Bahnsen

 

The Myth of Neutrality by Dr Greg Bahnsen

https://youtu.be/UuBkFqFOQqY

The Bahnsen Project

 

Most of Christian philosopher and presuppositionalist apologist Greg Bahnsen's lectures and sermons on various topics are now freely available at The Bahnsen Project as well as other websites like Covenant Media Foundation. Before his death in 1995, Greg Bahnsen was one of the leading proponents and expositors of Cornelius Van Til's presuppositional approach to apologetics.

 

https://www.cmfnow.com/

OR

https://www.sermonaudio.com/source_series.asp?sourceid=thebahnsenproject

https://www.sermonaudio.com/source_detail.asp?sourceid=thebahnsenproject

https://www.sermonaudio.com/solo/thebahnsenproject/sermons/series/

Debate: Atheist Tom Jump vs. Christian Presuppositionalist Joshua Pillows

 

Tom Jump Vs Joshua Pillows: Does the God of the Bible Exist? EP 208
https://youtu.be/JBBDW4bmCdE

Presuppositionalism vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue Between Joshua Pillows and David Pallmann

 

Presuppositionalism vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue Between Joshua Pillows and David Pallmann

Presup vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue
https://youtu.be/obXl6lqeU6Y

Responses to Dr. Richard Howe’s Alleged Refutation of Presuppositional Apologetics

 

The following link has various video responses to Richard Howe's attempted refutation of presuppositional apologetics.

https://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2020/05/14/responses-to-dr-richard-howes-alleged-refutation-of-presuppositional-apologetics/

Debate Resolution: There is Good Reason to Believe That the Christian God Exists [atheist Michael Long vs. Christian presuppositionalist Chris Bolt]

The following debate is between an atheist Michael Long and Christian Van Tillian presuppositionalist Chris Bolt.

Debate | Michael Long vs Chris Bolt Reasons To Think The Christian God Exists
https://youtu.be/We0BOqEWJao

Download mp3 HERE

The Age-Old Philosophical Problem of the One and the Many in Relation to the Trinity Addressed by Anthony Rogers

 

Anthony Rogers addresses the age-old philosophical problem of the one and the many and how the Christian doctrine of the Trinity helps solve the problem. He does this from a presuppositionalist point of view.

The Problem of the One and the Many w/Anthony Rogers
https://youtu.be/BVeGYUfsas4