Here are links to J.J. Blunt's classic book:
Undesigned Coincidences in the Writings Both of the Old and New Testaments, An Argument of Their Veracity; With an Appendix
http://biblecourses.com.au/blunt/index.html
or
http://www.archive.org/details/undesignedcoinci1851blun
or
http://books.google.com/books?id=g8hCAAAAIAAJ&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Here's are links to lectures by Tim McGrew on this topic. I'm not sure if any of the lectures are duplicates.
http://apologetics315.blogspot.com/2011/04/undesigned-coincidences-in-gospels-by.html
http://www.evidence4faith.com/shows/e4f-042411.mp3
http://youtu.be/9wUcrwYocgM
Here's a series of articles by Tim McGrew on Undesigned Coincidences:
Part ONE
Part TWO
Part THREE
Part FOUR
Part FIVE
Part SIX
A related work that touches upon these issues is Edmund Bennett's book The Four Gospels from a Lawyer’s Standpoint (1893)
In honestly I have to say that some of the force of the arguments that both Blunt and McGrew make are weakened if you take into consideration how tradition in the early Christian community (during the times when the Gospels were being written) could account for some of the coincidences. Along with that, the theory of Markan Priority can account for some of the coincidences. In other words, if we assume that Mark was the first Gospel written, then Matthew and Luke borrow from Mark, while John was written last (and probably with the awareness of the prior three), then some of the coincidences aren't that startling. The theory of Markan Priority isn't necessarily true, but a conservative Christian can consistently consider it as possibly true without compromising his beliefs. I myself lean toward Markan Priority (but not dogmatic on it). While Most liberal and conservative scholars hold to Markan Priority, not all do. For example, Messianic Jewish scholar Arnold Fruchtenbaum holds to Matthean Priority.
Update:
Ehrman vs McGrew on Undesigned Coincidences
No comments:
Post a Comment