Jonathan McLatchie (Recent) Articles on the Resurrection

 

 Do the Resurrection Narratives Contradict? A Reply to Dan McClellan
https://jonathanmclatchie.com/do-the-resurrection-narratives-contradict-a-reply-to-dan-mcclellan/


Responding to Dan McClellan on the Resurrection Accounts
https://jonathanmclatchie.com/responding-to-dan-mcclellan-on-the-resurrection-accounts/ 

The Resurrection of Jesus: The Evidential Contribution of Luke-Acts
https://jonathanmclatchie.com/the-resurrection-of-jesus-the-evidential-contribution-of-luke-acts/ 


The Evidential Value of John’s Gospel to the Case for Christianity
https://jonathanmclatchie.com/the-evidential-value-of-johns-gospel-to-the-case-for-christianity/

 

 

 

Dr. Greg Bahnsen, The Impropriety of Evidentially Arguing for the Resurrection

 

 

The following article is a classic one by presuppositionalist Greg Bahnsen. I myself am a presuppositionalist, but I like to sometimes use non-presuppositional arguments [or at least ones that aren't overtly presuppositional]. In this way, my apologetics can sometimes be similar to Steve Hays'

 

Dr. Greg Bahnsen, The Impropriety of Evidentially Arguing for the Resurrection
https://answersingenesis.org/apologetics/the-impropriety-of-evidentially-arguing-for-the-resurrection/

To balance off Bahnsen's views:

Is it improper to argue evidentially for the Resurrection? by Steve Hays
https://triablogue.blogspot.com/2020/04/is-it-improper-to-argue-evidentially.html

#13 Leaping Lessing’s Ugly, Broad Ditch by William Lane Craig
https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/leaping-lessings-ugly-broad-ditch 

 

 

 

 

Presuppositionalism vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue Between Joshua Pillows and David Pallmann

 

Presuppositionalism vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue Between Joshua Pillows and David Pallmann

Presup vs Evidentialism: A Respectful Dialogue
https://youtu.be/obXl6lqeU6Y